Public Eye on Davos 2002
Indietro Versione per stampare Trasmettere questa pagina


«The Public Eye on Davos» calls on corporate elites to support accountability  (04.02.02)
«The Public Eye on Davos» calls on corporate elites to support accountability
This statement is first presented by the Public Eye Coalition at its conference in New York, 31 January 2002. It is also formally presented to Prepcom 2 for the Johannesburg Summit preparatory conference taking place in New York 28 January to 8 February 2002

   «The Public Eye on Davos» calls on corporate elites to support accountability   (19 KB)
In the ten years since the “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro, when world leaders pledged to reverse the course of environmental degradation, international public assistance to developing countries has plummeted while private foreign investment increased rapidly. Corporations have seen their economic power and political influence grow. Yet corporations have not played a sufficiently responsible role as demonstrated by cases of corporate environmental, social and human rights abuses worldwide. One reason for the evident failure of corporations to thus far respond to the challenge of sustainable development is the absence of rules that balance the rights of corporations to trade and grow, with their responsibilities to society and the environment.

Action by the World’s Governments
The Public Eye on Davos calls on the world community to address the imbalance between corporate rights and responsibilities by agreeing to negotiate an intergovernmental treaty resulting in binding rules of transparency, accountability and liability on corporations at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in August 2002.

Action by the World Economic Forum (1)
The Public Eye on Davos calls on the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its members, whose annual meeting coincides with the Johannesburg preparatory conference, to publicly support and act on the initiative outlined above and the principles elaborated below.

The WEF claims it is a group dedicated to corporate responsibility, sustainable development and poverty alleviation. Yet many of its prominent corporate representatives continue to work behind the scenes against popular measures for these worthy goals. For the public to accept the sincerity of the WEF's public mindedness, it must end the widespread resistance to global measures for corporate accountability.

The Rationale for Increased Corporate Accountability
Governments must act now to ensure that corporations meet democratically-agreed national and international sustainable development and social justice objectives. Corporations world-wide claim to have embraced the concept of sustainable development and social responsibility in public statements and business strategies. However, the aim of achieving more equitable development within the carrying capacity of the global ecosystem remains elusive.

We insist that companies must have social and environmental duties - for example, full disclosure and transparency. All stakeholders ? including local communities and employees ? should be granted legal rights to challenge the activities of companies that threaten their interests. Local communities need rights of access and ultimate control over the resources needed to sustain healthy and sustainable lives. Standards of corporate behaviour need to improve. Corporations that commit criminal offences must be open to national and international legal action backed by strong and effective sanctions.

Many corporations have embraced the agenda of corporate social responsibility to differentiate themselves from competitors working to lower standards. Those who lag behind, however, are able to ignore the real long-term needs of people and the environment and gain competitive advantage as a result. For there to be a true level playing field, with a race to improve international standards of business behaviour, it is vital this situation is remedied.

Opportunity for Action: The UN World Summit on Sustainable Development
The UN 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development is an ideal opportunity for governments to respond to the calls for greater corporate accountability and for corporations to declare their support. Such a move would be a first step in redefining the relationship between companies and the societies in which they operate and is a necessary prerequisite for turning sustainable development from aspiration to reality.

Discussions and decisions that are relevant to the public should be held in institutions that abide by principles of transparency, accountability and democracry. As such, the most appropriate venue for discussing international corporate accountability is the UN, and the role of the UN must be strengthened. It is the only existing international organization that is based on universal representativity (at least on the level of nations). But reform making the UN more democratic, fair and effective is overdue.

Above all, the influence transnational corporations exert on the UN must be curbed. The UN must sever its partnership with global corporations as stipulated in the Global Compact. Governments must commit themselves to devising legally binding regulations for transnational corporations and the UN must establish the institutions to monitor and implement agreed rules. In contrast, the consultation and co?determination of civil society with the UN has to be extended so it can champion the goals of global justice, peace and sustainability.


(1)The World Economic Forum (WEF) is a private institution funded by 1000 of the world’s largest corporations. It seeks to strengthen the power of the private
sector's elite over international politics. Through its annual meeting, it provides a forum for the top echelons of CEOs to discuss their corporate wishlists for
finance and trade with invited high-ranking politicians and heads of international institutions. Economic and political directions for the future of the world are set
behind closed doors and without the WEF being accountable to the wider public.

Organisations endorsing the Public Eye statement 2002:

Australia

Cam Walker
Friends of the Earth Australia

Les Mac Donald
United Care Ageing and Disability Service/Uniting Church Australia


Austria

Hans Peter Graß
Friedensbüro Salzburg

Andreas Rennert
Plattform “Against racism”


Bangladesh

Arup Rahee
LOKOJ


Belgium

Alexandra Wandel
Friends of the Earth Europe

Steve Emmot
Greens, European Free Alliance Group/European Parliament

Carole Crabbe
Magasins du monde-Oxfam

Bendedicte Allaerte
Women in Development Europe


Cameroun

Christine Andela
Dialogues


Canada

Anuradha Mittal
Food First/Institute for Food&Development


Colombia

Alberto Yepes
Corporacíon Regíon


Costa Rica

Manuel Chiriboga
Asociacion Latinoamericana de Organizaciones de Promocion

Babriel Rivas-Ducca
Coecoceiba/Friends of the Earth


Czech Republic

Pavel Pribzl,
Hnuti Duha/Friends of the Earth


Denmark

Pernille Hagedorn-Rasmussen
Noah - Friends of the Earth-Denmark


Egypt

Said Samir
Roxy Research Center


France

Sébastien Godinot
Amis de la Terre/Friends of the Earth


Germany

Daniel Mittler
BUND/Friends of the Earth


Greece

Vangelis Stoyannis
Nea Ecologia/Frends of the Earth


Hungary

Viola Ferjentsik
BUDS Foundation for Human and Nature Protection


India

D. Narasimha Reddy
Centre for Resource Education

Ashish Kothari - Kalpavriksh
Enironmental Action Group

Shripad Dharmadhikary
Mathan Research Centre

M.K. Sukumar
Narmada Bachao Andolan

Ammu Abraham
Women’s Centre Bombay


Indonesia

Committee of Workers for Reform Action, KOBAR

Riza V. Tjahjadi
PAN Indonesia


Kenya

Grace Akumu
Climate Network Africa

Reginald Nalugada
Social Research Network Center


Latvia

Fanija Bluma
Green Liberty


Luxembourg

Mike Mathias
Action Solidarité Tiers Monde


Mexico

Elena Lazos Chavero
IIS-UNAM

Scott Robinson
University Metropolitana


Netherlands

Wiert Wiertsema
Both ENDS

Clean Cloth Campaign

Adam Ma’anit
Corporate Europe Observatory

Gerard Oonk
India Commitee of the Netherlands

Anneke van Luijken
IRENE

Fiona Dove
Transnational Institute

Marileen Reinders
University of Utrecht


Pakistan

Naeem Iqbal
SUNGI Development Foundation


Philippines

Joan Carling
Cordillera People’s Alliance

Gigi Francisco
Gender & Trade Network Asia

Arze Glipo
Integrated Rural Development Foundation

Jayson Cainglet
Resource Center for People’s Development

Victoria Tauli-Corpuz
Tebtebba Foundation


Slovakia

Jura Zamkovsky
Center for Environmental Public Advocacy/Friends of the Earth


Spain

Carola Reintjes
IDEAS/Fair trade


Switzerland

Denis von der Weid
Antenna International

Theo Buss
Bread for All

Marianne Hochuli
Erklärung von Bern

Fédération genevoise de coopération, Switzerland

Brian Mac Call
Geneva Federation for Development Cooperation

Gruppe Schweiz ohne Armee

Marc Steinlin
Helvetas

Mélanie Purser-Comte
International Federation Terre des Hommes

Beat Dietschy
Kommission für Gerechtigkeit Frieden und Bewahrung der Schöpfung

Prof. Mario von Cranach
Netzwerk für sozial verantwortliche Wirtschaft

Miriam Behrens
Pro Natura/Friends of the Earth-Switzerland

Barbara Heiler
Service Civil International

Brigitte Anderegg
Solifonds

Peter Brey
Terre des Hommes Foundation

Prof. Ulli Steinlin
University of Basle


Thailand

Walden Bello
Focus on the Global South


UK

Christopher Keene
Anti-Globalisation Network

Mark Curtis
Christian Aid

John D. Clark
London School of Economics

Clare Joy
World Development Mouvement


USA

Peter Stone
Anarchist Action of Rochester

Prof. John B. Cobb Jr.
Claremont School of Theology

Kenny Bruno
Corpwatch

Rev. Walter Stark
Cumberland Countians for Peace & Justice/United Church of Christ and
Network for Environmental & Economic Responsibility

John Gershman
Interhemispheric Resource Center

Mélanie Purser-Compte,
Maryknoll Fathers/Brothers

Cathy Rowan
Maryknoll Mission Association of the Faithful

Andrew George
National Forest Protection Alliance

Jeffrey Ballinger
Press for Change

Sandy Buffett
The Nautilus Institute for Security&Sustainable Development


Zimbabwe

Yash Tandon
International South Group